Archive for the ‘Book reviews’ Category
Just reviewed “Death of a Musketeer” for SBR
Folks, tonight I reviewed four books for Amazon.com and two for Shiny Book Review — THE PREDATOR STATE (as previously posted and this one, DEATH OF A MUSKETEER. Sarah d’Almeida did an exemplary job in adding this book to the Alexandre Dumas lore about the Musketeers, adding richness and complexity without slowing down the headlong plotline any.
Go read it!
http://shinybookreview.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/death-of-a-musketeer-fast-fun-furious/
Just reviewed “The Predator State” at SBR
Folks, before I forget, here’s the link to my review tonight for James K. Galbraith’s THE PREDATOR STATE, which is up at Shiny Book Review right now:
I wanted to point out that in addition to the examples used in my review, I believe current Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker fits Galbraith’s definition of what a predatory person can do with regards to government, and that he should perhaps be evaluated in that light as well.
Enjoy!
Just reviewed “What Distant Deeps” for SBR
I just reviewed WHAT DISTANT DEEPS by David Drake at Shiny Book Review; I enjoyed it, but felt the romantic subtext was lacking. (In other words, Captain Daniel Leary doesn’t know his head from a hole in the ground when it comes to the signals his Signals Officer, Adele Mundy, has been throwing off for the past seven books and now into the eighth book of the Royal Cinnabar Navy series.)
Mind, this particular book doesn’t need romance; it has good political intrigue, some action, well-developed characterization and some very nice (and unlikely) female bonding going on between Adele Mundy and Posthuma “Posy” Belisande, sister of the current Leader of Zenobia and former mistress of the head of the Alliance. But if Captain Leary had finally bought a clue, this book could’ve been much richer and deeper; instead, it’s very good, enjoyable, and interesting, but I keep wondering what else could’ve happened, finally, in the realm of character conflict if Leary had woken up and “smelled the coffee.”
Here’s the link to the review, for your edification:
http://shinybookreview.wordpress.com/2011/03/02/what-distant-deeps-an-appealing-departure/
Enjoy!
Just Reviewed “The Agent Gambit” by Lee and Miller
Folks, if you haven’t read Sharon Lee and Steve Miller’s speculative fiction yet, you really and truly should.
But in case I haven’t convinced you yet by my several previous blogs and reviews upon the subject, here is my latest review for THE AGENT GAMBIT, an omnibus put out by Baen Books that combines Lee and Miller’s very first Liaden Universe novel, AGENT OF CHANGE with their third novel (and direct sequel to the former) CARPE DIEM.
Enjoy!
New book review at SBR for Donaldson’s “Against All Things Ending”
Folks, I don’t know even where to begin trying to discuss AGAINST ALL THINGS ENDING, except that it’s excellent and depressing, hopeful yet sad, and develops further Stephen R. Donaldson’s theory that in guilt lies power, providing you use that guilt with wisdom and intelligence.
Please read my review for more:
Just reviewed Modesitt, Jr.’s “Empress of Eternity” — Excellent.
Folks, if you haven’t read EMPRESS OF ETERNITY yet, you should.
But in case you need a reason to read it, go read my review at Shiny Book Review right now:
Enjoy!
Just reviewed “Troubled Waters” at Shiny Book Review
Folks, I enjoy Sharon Shinn’s writing a great deal, so reading TROUBLED WATERS wasn’t a hardship. That said, it’s far from the best of her novels, and her magical universe — one which deals with five elements, but not the traditional five of air, fire, earth, water and spirit (instead, hers are water, air/spirit, earth, fire, and the Hunti or wood/bone element) — was not that unusual.
What was unusual, though, was a plot structure that required nearly a full half of the book before Zoe Ardelay (the main character) figures out who and what she is, and nearly a fourth of the book before Zoe makes much sense (as she starts off the book in the throes of grief as her father has just died; her mother died years before). That Zoe’s personality was more or less subsumed by her father, one of the Sweela element (or fire/mind), is a given; how she comes out of that is unusual and worth reading, yet is so slow-going that at times it was nearly torturous compared to other Sharon Shinn novelizations.
At any rate, here’s my latest review:
http://shinybookreview.wordpress.com/2011/01/22/sharon-shinns-troubled-waters-is-good-but-slow/
Hope y’all will enjoy it.
New review up at SBR for Sinclair’s “Hope’s Folly” and “Rebels and Lovers”
Folks, more of you should be reading Linnea Sinclair’s work. She writes excellent science fiction/romance, and has now branched out into military science fiction as well (milSF), though with some romance.
I truly enjoyed HOPE’S FOLLY and appreciated it on all levels; an excellent, worthy book that celebrates femininity and independence, along with a relationship of equals. Couldn’t say anything better about this book except I wanted more of it.
As for what I think about REBELS AND LOVERS — go read my review. Please! (You’ll also get a better review of HOPE’S FOLLY, in case you need a bit more, um, persuasion.)
http://shinybookreview.wordpress.com/2011/01/15/linnea-sinclairs-milsf-is-very-very-good/
Just reviewed “The Dragon Variation” and “Mouse and Dragon” at SBR; Comments.
Folks, here’s the link before I forget:
Now, a few comments from me (otherwise known as the peanut gallery):
These books are excellent. Truly outstanding. Magical, even . . . they get all the emotions right. All the mores right. All the cultural issues right. The language is impressive, the descriptions are just right, and the romances are conflicted, realistic, sometimes amusing and touching, all at once.
I wish I could write this like this pair of authors, Sharon Lee and Steve Miller; I truly do.
The end of my review talked about the emotional, powerful impact MOUSE AND DRAGON had on me. MOUSE AND DRAGON is about the too-brief marriage of Aelliana Caylon and Daav yos’Phelium, and is realistic in so many ways about what happens to a widower when his spouse dies that I can’t even tote them up on a toteboard. That Aelliana’s presence sticks around (more or less in ghost form) is not the most amazing part of this achievement; it’s that Sharon Lee and Steve Miller — neither of whom have been widowed as far as I know — got it right that our deceased spouses do live on. In us.
One of the issues I’ve had with widowhood from the beginning is that I didn’t know how to express my feelings over the loss of my husband beyond rage, despair, extreme frustration and loss. It’s really hard to lose a spouse when you’re only thirty-nine years old, and you’ve only had a few, short years together. Blissful years, sure. But still — far too short.
The entire story of Daav’s marriage — how he met Aelliana, in SCOUT’S PROGRESS. How he married her, then lost her, in MOUSE AND DRAGON. How he dealt with her continued presence in FLEDGLING and SALTATION — has now been sketched out. It is a stunning achievement, one that I can’t praise highly enough; it shows two extremely intelligent people who are constrained by circumstances that manage to forge a life together, then manage to keep on loving each other in a meaningful way after one of the pair’s physical death.
Daav’s solution — which I will discuss here, but I warn you it is a spoiler if you haven’t read the end of MOUSE AND DRAGON, or any of FLEDGLING or SALTATION — is to immerse himself in an alternate identity, Jen Sar Kiladi, and thus take a lover. He has a child, Theo Waitley, by his lover, who is a half-sibling of his son Val Con yos’Phelium by his wife, Aelliana Caylon. And Aelliana has stuck around; she still views herself as Daav’s wife, and despite him taking a lover (at her insistence, I might add), nothing has changed for them as far as their feelings go. It’s just that because she no longer has a physical body, she can’t meet all his physical needs.
I’ve been pondering this. I think there’s something here that might help me, psychologically, deal with something I’ve really not wanted to have to think about — possibly being with another man.
You see, Michael was the ultimate in my experience. The best husband (as I had two previous ones, believe you me, I know how good a husband he was). The best, and most supportive person, I have ever had the privilege to know, yet he was not sycophantic and would tell me off if he felt the need (which, fortunately for me, was rarely).
How do you go beyond “the ultimate?” How do you find any meaning with anyone else?
I don’t know, but I’m finally willing to at least consider the possibility that someone extraordinary — someone like Kamele Waitley was for Daav/Jen Sar — might exist out there.
I’d best end this now, or I’ll get maudlin — and trust me, none of us need that.