Barb Caffrey's Blog

Writing the Elfyverse . . . and beyond

Brewers Sweep Reds — Then Lose to Astros. Huh?

leave a comment »

I have been puzzled by many things when it comes to the 2012 edition of the Milwaukee Brewers.  Why Brewers manager Ron Roenicke and Brewers pitching coach Rick Kranitz continue to have jobs is definitely at the top of the list.

The Brewers had a three-game homestand on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday against the best team in the National League — the Cincinnati Reds.  And what do you know?  The Brewers swept them.

Now, as to why I didn’t say anything about it?  I was hoping to write something tonight about the Brewers now having a four-game winning streak, and I didn’t want to jinx it.

Anyway, the Brewers were doing well against the Houston Astros in the top of the eighth inning, as they were leading, 3-1, in Houston after a nifty start by Brewers rookie starting pitcher Mark Rodgers.  However, Houston scored a run against Brewers reliever Francisco “K-Rod” Rodriguez in the bottom of the eighth, which made the game 3-2.

The Brewers ninth came and went, so it was up to Brewers relief pitcher John Axford to close out the 3-2 win.  However, Axford was wild; worse, Axford couldn’t seem to throw strikes.  And because of this, Axford ended up first blowing the save, as the Astros tied it up, 3-3; then, Axford also lost the game, as the Astros scored the winning run, 4-3.

Rodgers’ winning effort goes for nothing, all because Roenicke didn’t have the sense he was born with to get someone else in there once it was clear Axford didn’t have it.  (Two batters in would’ve been soon enough; also, that was before the Astros scored a run, so maybe a different pitcher would’ve still been able to save the game.)

And what really stinks about this is that Brewers reliever Jim Henderson (a thirty-year-old rookie who has two saves in two save opportunities) and Axford were both ready to go in the bottom of the ninth.  However, Brewers pitching coach Rick Kranitz (who supposedly consults with Roenicke on every pitcher, all the time) called for Axford.  And then, Roenicke didn’t realize he needed to get Axford out of there — which is why I blame them both for this loss.

See, sometimes it’s easy to blame a player like Axford who just doesn’t have it.  But Axford is a very good pitcher who’s tried everything to get it together; as I’ve said before, I think there’s something mental, not physical, going on there (though if I were the Brewers, I’d also check out Axford’s pitching mechanics with a specialist, just to cover all the bases).

That’s why I blame Kranitz and Roenicke instead, as they are supposed to understand when one of their players is having trouble.  Yet, for whatever reason, they just didn’t — and when Axford, quite predictably, ran into problems, neither of them seemed to believe there were any other viable options than Axford. 

Even though Henderson was warm in the bullpen.  And certainly could’ve at least attempted to save that win for Mark Rodgers and the rest of the Brewers, especially considering that Axford had shown nothing while putting the first two guys on base.

Yet Roenicke and Kranitz didn’t make a change.  And the Brewers lost.  Again.

That’s how the Brewers, who looked great at home against the Reds, ended up losing to the worst team in baseball, the lowly Houston Astros. 

And as it’s the joint failure of the Brewers manager and Brewers pitching coach that led to this unlikely win for the Astros, not just the failure of any specific pitcher (even though it’s obvious Axford had nothing), my solution is simple: fire Kranitz and Roenicke.  Fire them both.  Now.

Otherwise, they will both continue to make bad decisions about which pitchers should come in, and which shouldn’t.  (As they’ve done all year long.)   And they’ll never blame themselves; oh, no.  Instead, they’ll blame the players — yet it’s obvious that the blame must be shared to anyone excepting these two men: Rick Kranitz, pitching coach.  And Ron Roenicke, manager.

That’s unacceptable to me as a Brewers fan.  Especially as I have eyes and a brain, and know how to use both.  Which is why I’m sick and tired of Roenicke and Kranitz continuing have jobs when, during the course of 2012, they’ve done nothing to deserve it. 

The definition of insanity has often been given as, “Doing the same thing over and over again after it’s already been proven not to work.”  If that’s the case, then Kranitz and Roenicke have both proven that they are not up to the task of doing even a mediocre job for the Brewers.  Which is why both of them should be fired, soonest.

Update on Oak Creek Shooting; Other Updates

leave a comment »

This is yet another day where I don’t really have time to write a full blog post, but do have a number of things to say.  So let’s get to it.

First, the latest update regarding the Oak Creek, WI, shooting that left six innocents dead and three innocents wounded is as follows: the Federal Bureau of Investigation has revealed that the gunman, Wade Michael Page, actually took his own life after being shot by the police.  Funeral arrangements are being made for the six dead; of the three who were severely wounded, two are still in critical condition, while the third, a local policeman, is recovering with amazing speed.

Second, the Racine Concert Band will have another concert this Sunday at the Racine Zoo.  (Showtime is 7 p.m.)  I’m to play alto saxophone this week, after playing clarinet last week . . . I view myself as the Vinny Rottino of the Racine Concert Band (with tongue planted firmly in cheek).

Speaking of Rottino, here’s a nice write-up about him that I somehow missed last week from the Let’s Go Tribe blog.  This blog discusses Rottino’s career and how he’s always hit, but how his defense isn’t quite major-league ready except at first base and left field — but because Rottino’s not a prototypical power hitter, and those positions usually are played by people who are, that’s why Rottino rarely gets a chance to bat in the major leagues.

I’ve not seen Rottino play third base or right field, but I know that Rottino has a good arm and is an extremely smart player.  He’s made himself into a decent catcher despite learning to play the position late (he took it up when he was 24 or 25); he rarely makes baserunning mistakes or fielding miscues.  And as I’ve said many times, I believe Rottino will hit if he’s given a chance at the major league level, especially considering the fact that he’s hit everywhere else.

Also regarding Rottino, here’s a link to an article from November of 2006 from the Baseball Prospectus, written by Kevin Goldstein that I somehow missed previously.  Goldstein says bluntly:

If you aren’t rooting for Vinny Rottino, there’s something very, very wrong with you. Undrafted out of Wisconsin-LaCrosse, the Brewers signed Rottino in 2003 as a local product who could fill some organizational holes, yet all he’s done is hit at every level, including a .314/.379/.440 mark at Triple-A Nashville this year, good enough to earn him his major-league debut.

Note Goldstein’s first line: “If you aren’t rooting for Vinny Rottino, there’s something very, very wrong with you.”  (I couldn’t have said it better myself.)

Mind, Goldstein also pointed out (later in the blurb) that Rottino’s glove is not major-league ready (or that it wasn’t in ’06, at any rate), particularly at the catching position.  But it’s been six years, and there has been massive improvement in that area; in addition, Rottino’s overall defense has improved, something that few other baseball players can say.

I keep wondering if Vinny Rottino has read Malcolm Gladwell’s book OUTLIERS.  This is relevant because  Toronto Blue Jays OF José Bautista, adjudged a late bloomer by many, found Gladwell’s book extremely helpful. 

I reviewed OUTLIERS over at Shiny Book Review a while back.  What I appreciated most about this book was how Gladwell pointed out that the best way to position yourself for victory in anything is to persist.  Providing you have the talent, the skills and the smarts to begin with, persistence is the only thing that will set you apart from the crowd, regardless of your chosen field.  Add to that the fact is that sometimes people give up on themselves too early due to forces beyond their control, and it’s obvious what a gifted player needs to do if he or she hasn’t yet made it: just keep trying.

Rottino has shown the value of persistence in his ten-year-long minor league career.  He’s improved his skills throughout, and has continued to hit at every level.  And by doing this — working on his craft, and refusing to give up — Rottino has put himself in a position to win.  Which is all he, or anyone else, can do.

I have a lot of sympathy for Rottino, because my journey with regards to publishing has been slow.  Yet all I can do is show that I do have the talent and just keep trying; this means I have to keep writing and editing, keep networking with other writers and editors, etc.  And of course continue to review books, as half the time this is how I end up getting to know a new and interesting writer.

Rest assured that I will do, in my fashion, what Rottino has done in his — keep getting better, and keep putting myself in a position to win.

My beloved husband Michael would expect no less.

Written by Barb Caffrey

August 8, 2012 at 11:50 pm

Quick Hits, August 2012 edition

leave a comment »

Folks, I don’t have much time today, so let’s get to the top stories that I’m keeping an eye on:

First, the shooting at the Sikh temple in Oak Creek, WI, obviously concerns me.  (Here’s a link to a comprehensive story by the Christian Science Monitor by way of Yahoo News, in case you haven’t heard about this — even if you have, this is possibly the best story I’ve seen thus far.)  The guy who shot and killed six people while wounding three others, Wade Michael Page, was a white supremacist; that he, too, was eventually shot and killed by the police doesn’t seem like nearly enough of a punishment.

See, the Sikhs are a nonviolent, monotheistic religion.  But people like Page don’t seem to understand more than two things — most Sikhs aren’t white.  And most Sikhs wear turbans, something few white people do as a matter of course.  Those two things outweigh the fact that the Sikhs aren’t looking to cause trouble for anyone, at least in the mind of a white supremacist . . . and it’s sad beyond belief that the latter two things outweighed everything else in Page’s mind.

Otherwise, the Milwaukee Brewers have waived shortstop Cesar Izturis — Izturis has already been claimed by the Washington Nationals, so it doesn’t seem like Izturis is really going to lose out on the deal — and have called up Jean Segura from AA Huntsville.  Segura was hitting over .400 there in eight games, and had stolen four bases; apparently that’s all the Brewers wanted to see before calling Segura up.

It’s clear that the Brewers are in heavy rebuilding mode, which has to be incredibly frustrating for other, long-term Brewers like Corey Hart and Yovani Gallardo.  But maybe admitting that they’re rebuilding will loosen up the 2012 edition of the Brewers; goodness knows, nothing else has worked.

Aside from that, I’m going over AN ELFY ABROAD (the direct sequel to ELFY) and trying to stay cool as the heat really hasn’t lifted in over two solid months.  (Along with the detritus of daily life, which really isn’t any fun to have to deal with, so why write about it?)

That’s about it . . . perhaps tomorrow will bring a full blog subject or two.  (Here’s hoping.)

Written by Barb Caffrey

August 6, 2012 at 8:36 pm

Vinny Rottino Optioned to AAA Columbus

leave a comment »

Folks, in some ways Vinny Rottino getting optioned back to AAA Columbus from the Cleveland Indians is good as it means Cleveland obviously still wants him.  But of course it has to be frustrating for Rottino to be up in the major leagues for two days, then to be sent back down.

Rottino’s most recent stint in the majors was as follows: he went 0 for 5 with 1 RBI (on a sacrifice fly), striking out once.  His batting average in the majors this year (thus far at any rate) is .158; he has 2 home runs, 6 RBI, has scored 8 runs, stolen 3 bases, taken 6 bases on balls and struck out 10 times.

At any rate, Rottino’s had a good season at AAA and it’s likely that he’ll be called up again in September once rosters expand.  At that point, I hope Rottino will finally get a decent shot to show that he really can hit major league pitching.

Written by Barb Caffrey

August 4, 2012 at 10:23 pm

Posted in baseball, Vinny Rottino

Just Reviewed Rosemary Edghill’s “Vengeance of Masks” at SBR

leave a comment »

Folks, if you haven’t read Rosemary Edghill’s writing yet, you should.  She’s one of the best writers working in any genre, and her books never disappoint.

That’s why I find it so hard to believe that she had to self-publish the entirety of her interesting, surprising, different SF/F hybrid novel THE VENGEANCE OF MASKS, especially as this novel contains many elements that are traditional in dark fantasy epics — which means there are cognates out there (in other words, if you’ve read any of Cathrynne M. Valente’s dark fantasy, or Michaele Jordan’s, or Jane Lindskold’s, or most especially Jacqueline Carey’s, you will enjoy THE VENGEANCE OF MASKS.)

I’ll tell you what — if you aren’t reading every single thing Rosemary Edghill writes, if only to figure out why and how she puts stories together, you are missing out.  (Big-time.)  And when you consider that she writes cracking-good adventure stories, great and realistic romances (even under uneasy and often off-putting situations), and that she never disappoints, it is beyond me why she doesn’t have a far greater readership.

That said, her novel THE VENGEANCE OF MASKS  is excellent, as I said in my review tonight at Shiny Book Review (SBR).  Constantly surprising, always engaging, and compulsively readable, this is one novel that should be bought, read, and re-read as it is excellent in every particular.

Seriously.  Go to Lulu right now and buy THE VENGEANCE OF MASKS.  Then read it, enjoy it, and recommend it to your friends — because trust me: if you like dark fantasy and/or sword and sorcery epics and/or science fiction/fantasy romance, you will love THE VENGEANCE OF MASKS.

Vinny Rottino Called Up by Cleveland Indians

leave a comment »

Folks, if you’re a regular reader of my blog, you should know by now that I appreciate two main things when it comes to people: hard work, and persistence.  Yes, you must have talent, but you also must work to apply your talent . . . at any rate, the application of hard work and effort to maximize talent is what I celebrate most when it comes to baseball player Vinny Rottino, 32, of Racine.

Rottino’s been working for the past ten years, all to get a legitimate shot at playing in the major leagues.  He is a utility infielder and outfielder who also catches; he’s a good baserunner, knows how to advance the runner, is an unselfish player, and can steal a base or two for you as he has deceptive speed — and due to his knowledge of pitchers and pitching from catching them so often in the minors, he rarely gets caught stealing.

I’ve been a strong proponent of Rottino getting his shot at the major league level.  I believe he can hit major league pitching, if only given a week or so to adjust to it; I also believe that if a team gives him a legitimate chance to show what he can do, Rottino will thrive. 

And even though he is now 32, he takes good care of his body; maybe Rottino could be another guy like Julio Franco who plays well into his forties due to how well-conditioned and smart Rottino has been throughout his playing career. 

Age is just a number, folks.  (I really wish major league baseball executives would learn to keep this in mind.)  What matters is the size of a person’s heart, first; then, it’s down to two things (providing you have the talent to play minor league baseball at any level to begin with): how hard you’re willing to work, and how long you’re willing to keep trying.

Rottino works hard.  And he’s extremely persistent.  Which is why I’m thrilled that Rottino got called up by the Cleveland Indians.

Here’s the straight scoop:  on Wednesday evening (August 1, 2012, to be exact), Rottino got the call from Cleveland.  His manager, Manny Acta, immediately inserted Rottino into the lineup for Thursday night’s game; Rottino played left field, taking an 0-for-4 at the plate with one RBI.

Here are some words from Rottino, courtesy of last night’s blog at the Cleveland Plain Dealer, written by Paul Hoynes:

“I’m glad they’re throwing me right in there,” said Rottino, 32. “I don’t want to sit around and wait.”

The Indians claimed Rottino on waivers from the Mets on June 27. He was optioned to Class AAA Columbus where he hit .299 (35-for-117) with nine doubles, four homers and 32 RBI in 30 games. This is his third trip to the big league this year, the first two coming with the Mets.

“My swing feels good,” said Rottino. “My approach feels good. I got limited playing time with New York. So I was excited to just start playing again. I got off to a nice start.”

Another reason I like Rottino so much, as a player, is because he doesn’t point fingers at anyone.  He simply states the truth.  I think that’s wonderful.

Going back to Hoynes’s blog, it was obvious that Hoynes was surprised by how many gloves Rottino brought with him — eight — and how many positions Rottino plays (everything except second base, shortstop, and pitcher).  Here are a few more words from Rottino regarding that:

“I’ve got four gloves and four backup gloves,” said Rottino. “I can catch, play third, first and all three outfield spots.

“I love catching the most of all the positions, but I’ve played mostly outfield the last two years.”

This blog also pointed out that as Rottino is taking the place of Travis Hafner (currently on paternity leave), Rottino’s stay in the majors may be short — and if it is, Rottino could end up designated for assignment (DFA’d) again.  But Rottino is thinking positively, and apparently, so is writer Hoynes, who ends his blog with:

There could be some roster changes coming with the Indians seven games out of first place. They designated Derek Lowe, 39, for assignment Wednesday. If changes are made, Rottino might be able to stick around a little longer than Saturday. 

Let us all sincerely hope so.  (And as always — good luck, Vinny.  ‘Cause I know you have the talent.)

Written by Barb Caffrey

August 3, 2012 at 5:23 pm

Two More Noted Writers Have Died — Gore Vidal and Maeve Binchy

leave a comment »

Sometimes, writing this blog is more an exercise in discussing other writers who’ve gone before me — especially in a week like this, where not one, but two noted writers have passed away.

First, the popular Irish writer Maeve Binchy, perhaps best known for her novel CIRCLE OF FRIENDS, died on Monday, July 30, 2012.  She was 72.  As this obituary from the Los Angeles Times states, Binchy didn’t sell her first novel until she was 42; that novel, LIGHT A PENNY CANDLE, did very well, to the point that Binchy compared that success to winning the lottery.

Over the past thirty years, Binchy sold over 40 million novels, most being marketed as romance.  Three of her stories, the novels CIRCLE OF FRIENDS and TARA ROAD, and a short story, “How About You,” were made into films.  Binchy’s obituary in the Times includes the following book reviewer’s comment from 1999:

“A hallmark of a Binchy book is a cast of characters Dickens would relish,” Mary McNamara wrote in The Times in 1999, “all pairing and sundering, congregating and dispersing in an operatic minuet. Plots and subplots surface and submerge” in a story that invariably ends in “acceptance and growth.”

Yet Binchy herself, while she viewed her success as gratifying, felt her work was best-suited to beachgoers and vacationers.  And she said, more than once, that she felt lucky to have been born in an age when the mass-market paperback was so popular.

The main reason I point this out is because Binchy was the sort of down-to-Earth writer that most of us would love to have had a conversation with.  While she was witty, her wit wasn’t the type that hurt anyone; Binchy instead invited everyone to share in the joke along with her.  Her work celebrated humanity precisely because of our often messy and sometimes fractious relationships with other human beings.

Contrast that with the other writer who died this week, Gore Vidal.  Vidal died on July 31, 2012 at the age of 86, and was as well-known for being a raconteur as he was for his writing.  Yet Vidal’s writing also showcased humanity, mostly by using historical events (such as in celebrated historical novel, JULIAN) and huge canvases to convey the human condition in every possible respect.

Vidal was one of the most respected voices in American literature.  Highly quotable and often profane, Vidal was a successful writer in any medium he tried — feature films (he helped to write “Ben-Hur”), plays (“The Best Man”), popular novels (MYRA BRECKENRIDGE), and historical novels (JULIAN, LINCOLN, and BURR), just to name a few.

Vidal’s obituary in the Washington Post describes more about Vidal’s remarkable life, including the fact that he served in World War II and was well-known for his rapier wit on talk shows.  Here’s a bit from his obituary:

In print or on television — he was a frequent talk-show guest — the worldly Mr. Vidal provoked controversy with his laissez-faire attitude toward every sort of sexuality, his well-reasoned disgust with what he called American imperialism and his sophisticated cynicism about love, religion, patriotism and other sacred cows.

He took an acerbic view of American leadership. “Today’s public figures can no longer write their own speeches or books,” he once quipped, “and there is some evidence they cannot read them either.”

Vidal was the type of man who enjoyed being controversial.  Yet Vidal, the writer, tended to stay within himself; he wrote novels, such as the historically-inspired JULIAN**, with a trained eye toward mores, customs, and language.  These three things, all of which goes to show how well Vidal knew his craft, were paramount; only after they had been satisfied would Vidal add in various cynical cracks regarding historical figures.  And even then, Vidal would do so in order to show that cynicism is not new to the modern era; it’s been with us since the dawn of time.

Two excellent writers have passed from this Earth, but their literary output remains.  If you haven’t read anything by either one of them, go straight to your library and request Binchy’s CIRCLE OF FRIENDS or TARA ROAD; read Vidal’s hilarious satire MYRA BRECKENRIDGE or his excellent historicals, most particularly LINCOLN, BURR, and JULIAN.  But do read these authors, and let their work inspire you, move you, or (especially in the case of Vidal’s non-fiction) annoy you.

In that way, their work will remain: immutable, timeless, and real.

———

** I’ve read JULIAN, and I tend to see it as Biblically-inspired because of certain ways Emperor Julian looks at the early Christian church.  The Emperor definitely doesn’t appreciate the rise of Christianity, but at first he believes he can use it — at least, before the church uses him.

What you need to read in the Bible to give you a sense of this time are the letters of St. Paul — his Epistles — to the Corinthians and others.  Paul was a politician, something that most Biblical readers tend to forget; he was building a church, and in so doing, he had to tread carefully.

Of course, Emperor Julian lived three hundred years later than St. Paul.  But Emperor Julian was quite a bit closer to that time than, say, to ours, and Vidal’s writing reflects this.

That’s why I view JULIAN as a type of passion-play; Julian himself is doomed, as the Christian Church was too advanced for him to fight. 

There are many Biblical allusions that can be made here; I’m sure there are also allusions that can be made to the Koran, to the Bhagavad-Gita, and to other noteworthy holy books, as the story of a great, albeit flawed, man up against forces beyond himself is one that definitely has withstood the test of time.   Vidal did this deliberately as a conscious author’s decision, and it works, both as a method for telling the story and as a way to demonstrate this particular story’s universality.

Written by Barb Caffrey

August 2, 2012 at 4:57 pm

Eight Olympic Badminton Players Disqualified Due to Apparent Match-Throwing

with one comment

Folks, you cannot make this stuff up.

Here it is, the 2012 London Olympics, and a bunch of players in one sport, badminton, have been disqualified after apparently throwing matches.

Here’s a link to Martin Rogers’s story at Yahoo:

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/olympics–eight-badminton-players-booted-from-olympics-for-throwing-matches.html

Now, here’s a relevant quote:

Olympic badminton authorities booted the eight players who attempted to throw matches out of the Games on Wednesday, but the real culprits are the officials who organized the tournament.

Two South Korean pairs, a Chinese and an Indonesian team will be stripped of their place in the quarterfinals unless an appeal against the punishment is granted. All four teams were determined to have tried to lose their final matches in the women’s doubles group stage in order to secure a more favorable draw in the knockout round.

Rogers explains the real problem here — the fact that badminton has gone to a “first-phase group” system.  All four badminton doubles teams that have now been disqualified had already made it into the next round, which was single-elimination; the reason they apparently threw these matches is because they didn’t want to meet up with other good teams in the single-elimination round.  And he points out that all of this could’ve been easily avoided if the badminton team organizers would’ve just not come up with this silly group format in the first place; yes, some deserving teams would’ve lost, and lost early, but this nonsense would’ve been avoided.

Now, the Associated Press’s story, filed a bit earlier (approximately forty-five minutes ago), has a bit more information regarding what the Badminton World Federation has to say about it all after disqualifying these eight:

The Badminton World Federation investigated two teams from South Korea and one each from China and Indonesia. It accused them of “not using one’s best efforts to win a match” and “conducting oneself in a manner that is clearly abusive or detrimental to the sport” in matches Tuesday night.

Of course, the Indonesian team has vowed to appeal, saying that the Chinese teams have been known to “lose on purpose” in the past.  Which just goes to show you how ugly Olympic sports can be — even more “minor” sports, ones that in the United States we probably don’t think much about except during the Olympics.

As for my take?  I think this is a complete embarrassment, both to the Olympics and to the sport of badminton as a whole.  When spectators actually boo matches — as they repeatedly did in London last evening — and nothing gets done immediately, that’s wrong.  When Olympics organizers are forced to defend not giving refunds in the face of this sort of abusive behavior — all because these four teams wanted to set up better matches for themselves in the single-elimination, match-play round — that’s disgusting.

And considering that one of these matches had, as its longest rally, a four-volley exchange before one of the players deliberately hit the shuttlecock wide — when I’m sure that anyone who’s ever played badminton in the backyard, like me, could do better than this — it’s obvious why spectators felt forced to boo.  (I would’ve booed, too, in their place.)

Anyway, all four doubles teams are appealing, but my guess is that their appeals will be denied. 

As well they should be.

Written by Barb Caffrey

August 1, 2012 at 8:52 am

Milwaukee Brewers Fire Bullpen Coach Stan Kyles

leave a comment »

Folks, the bad news keeps on coming for the Milwaukee Brewers pitching staff; today, due to a series of several horrible games for many members of the bullpen (including John Axford and Francisco Rodriguez), the Brewers fired bullpen coach Stan Kyles.

I do not approve of this, even though I understand that someone was going to have to take the blame for how poorly the bullpen, as a whole, has done this season.  The Brewers bullpen’s record is 15-26 with a 4.80 ERA, which is the worst in the major leagues.  The Brewers have also blown the most saves in the major leagues — 20 — with 13 of them being blown by closers Rodriguez and Axford alone.  But it’s ridiculous that Kyles, who doesn’t work on mechanics with these pitchers (pitching coach Rick Kranitz does that), and also doesn’t choose which pitcher to bring in (Kranitz and manager Ron Roenicke do that) was thrown to the wolves, mid-season, in a similar manner to how long-time bullpen coach/short-time pitching coach Bill Castro was fired mid-season in 2009.

Look.  There’s another thing in play here that most commentators are completely overlooking.  The fact that Jeff Adcock, who worked as a Brewers groundskeeper for many years and was one of the major bullpen “helpers” — a guy everyone in the bullpen knew, and knew well — died at Miller Park earlier this year certainly has a great deal to do with why the bullpen is underperforming.  This poor man died in front of some of the relievers, and as far as I know, nothing has been done to help any of these men deal with their loss.

Now, maybe the Brewers organization has sent these men to sports psychologists, grief counselors, or have done what they feel needed to be done and it’s still not helped.  But if the Brewers organization hasn’t done this, it should be done now, as it’s possible that if these guys are able to discuss their grief and sadness over this poor man dying without them being able to do anything to affect the outcome that it will help the Brewers on-the-field performance.

My belief is that there’s something that’s gone wrong inside these men’s heads, and that it has nothing to do with their actual ability.  The fact that Axford pitched several innings of sparkling relief when he wasn’t a closer, only to screw up once inserted back into the closing role, makes me think that there’s something else wrong there — and not with his pitching arm.  The fact that K-Rod was good as a set-up man before he was put back into the closer’s role, too, adds credence to my belief.  And finally, as if I needed any further reason for believing the way I do, the strangely inconsistent performance of Kameron Loe (who, if I remember right, was one of those relievers who knew Adcock the best, and may have been in the bullpen when Adcock had his fatal heart attack) since Adcock died makes me believe that he, in particular, needs to discuss his feelings with a priest, counselor, or sports psychologist.  (Or maybe all three.)

What I’m doing my best to remember is that every single one of the Brewers is a human being first, baseball player second.   They’ve all worked very hard to get to the major leagues.  None of them want to screw up, much less screw up royally; all of them want to do well every day, even though they know that’s impossible, and it seems to me that not one of them has any idea why the bullpen has melted down.

Anyway, the Brewers have now made their desperation move by firing their bullpen coach.  But they’d do much better if they got Axford, Rodriguez, Loe, and the other long-term members of the bullpen to psychologists, counselors, or maybe even priests — because I’m convinced that much of what’s gone wrong has little to do with their arms, and everything to do with their heads.

Written by Barb Caffrey

July 30, 2012 at 6:42 pm

Just Reviewed Linnea Sinclair’s “An Accidental Goddess” at SBR

leave a comment »

Folks, after this past week — especially after hearing about the death of my late husband’s good friend, military science fiction writer Ric Locke — I needed to read a fun, fast, and romantic book that could hold my interest.

Luckily for me, I had a book like that in reserve; it’s Linnea Sinclair’s excellent military science fiction/romance with paranormal elements, AN ACCIDENTAL GODDESS, which is why I’ve reviewed it at Shiny Book Review this evening.  I’ve called it one of my favorite “comfort books” in the past, as it’s a book I’ve read over and over again because of how enjoyable it is, how quickly the plot moves along despite how many plot elements Sinclair deftly juggles during the course of the book, and because this is a military SF plot with essential paranormal elements.

Now, this last point is the one you need to keep in mind, especially if you’ve read any of Sharon Lee and Steve Miller’s books (particularly any of their stories in their trademarked Liaden Universe), or if you’ve read any of the military SF/romance of Debra Doyle and James D. MacDonald.  Both of those pairs of authors write convincing military SF with paranormal elements; aside from those two pairs, and Linnea Sinclair herself, there just isn’t that much of this type of book on the market.

And I find that puzzling, because the fact is that the more interest you have in a book, the better.  And if someone — or in the case of Lee/Miller and Doyle/MacDonald, a pair of writers — can write a novel that has convincing science fiction and convincing fantasy elements at the same time, readers tend to jump all over it and remember these books.  (And recommend them to their friends, too, for that matter.)

At any rate, if you haven’t picked up AN ACCIDENTAL GODDESS yet and you love romantic SF or especially love romantic SF with paranormal elements, you owe it to yourself to get yourself a copy of this book.  Then, block out two or three hours, and dig in.  I promise you, this is a book you’ll enjoy — and remember — for years to come.

Written by Barb Caffrey

July 28, 2012 at 11:03 pm