Barb Caffrey's Blog

Writing the Elfyverse . . . and beyond

Posts Tagged ‘philosophy

Some Days…A Sunday Reflections Post

with 2 comments

Folks, the last few days at Chez Caffrey have been a bit difficult. Also, perplexing, frustrating, annoying…the list goes on and on.

So, why am I cluttering up the internet with my issues, as vaguely described above? I thought maybe I could talk a little about perseverance during times you’d rather not have, especially as it’s now Sunday.

When you’re having a bad day, or a series of bad days, the best you can do is to remind yourself that you’re doing everything in your power to improve the situation. That said, the most important thing is to live through it. Persevere. Sometimes it’ll feel like you’re heading into a heavy fog, uncertain of when you’ll come back out of it, but you have to believe that as you keep putting one foot in front of the other, you eventually will come to the end of that fog bank and into the clear again.

One thing I do know is this: Every single last one of us on the face of the earth has faced a bad day, a series of bad days, or has had to deal with things not of their own making impacting upon their own lives in a not-so-good manner. Whether it’s work, school, family, significant others (if they haven’t reached the “family” stage), we’ve all faced something that taxes our patience, taxes our strength, and taxes our fortitude.

That was the meaning of the apocryphal tale of the Buddha I’ve mentioned before here at my blog. A woman came to the Buddha and was sore in spirit. She wanted to know if there was any place on earth where people did not grieve, where they did not know the soreness of this particularly and exquisitely awful type of pain. The Buddha told her to go around the world, and bring the answer back to him.

Of course, the answer was that we all grieve.

I am not a Zen Buddhist, as my late husband Michael was, but what I understood about Buddhism wasn’t that you didn’t feel things. You did your best to accept what you felt, and acceptance, at least in Michael’s case, led to a far more serene exterior than anyone else I’ve ever met, before or since.

See, he knew that life could give you some seriously sour lemons from time to time. He’d experienced this in his own life. His first career, the one he’d always dreamed of, was not possible due to finding out — after he’d started that career (in the Navy) — that he had something called chondromalacia, which was possibly brought on by very early appearing arthritis. (He was still younger than twenty.) Then, after that, he went to work as a civilian for the Navy, to still try to help in some way, and worked his way up to becoming a contracts administrator. He was very, very good at that job. But then, the Naval base in Oakland closed, and he lost his job. At around age forty. Then, also around that time, he and his first wife split up (and he didn’t know then, couldn’t know then, that they’d retain a friendship until the end of his life).

In other words, he faced a whole lot of challenges, and life didn’t always give him his due.

Then again, he told me that if he hadn’t faced some of those challenges, he’d not have been ready for me. I thought this was an incredibly enlightened thing to say, and that’s why I’m passing it on.

So, for those of you who, like me, are struggling right now, remember this: You matter. Your life experience, whatever you’ve lived through, whatever you are living through now, can sometimes — if you’re anything like me — feel like it’s weighing you down so much, you can barely walk around. But whatever it is, you have to remember that you are still important, you matter, and the best thing you can do is to survive and live another day.

All of the experiences we have matter, too. As does whether we learn from them, too.

I figure if even the Buddha didn’t have an answer as to why we must feel grief and emotional pain in this life, that answer does not exist. That being said, we have to treat each other with kindness, empathy, and compassion…otherwise, what the Hell are we doing here?

Do What Is Right

with 2 comments

Folks, whenever I ask myself what I should do next, I hear this: “Do what is right.”

Now, what’s right for me may not be right for you, and vice versa. But what I do know is, if I want to live with myself in any sort of harmony at all, I have to examine whatever I do in the lines of the above.

See, it’s very easy to say, “do what is right.” But doing it? All the time? As best you can? It’s not so easy…but in my case, it’s the only way for me to live with myself.

My view of “do what is right” is quite simple. If it’s ethical; if it’s principled; if it’s honest; if it’s above-board, those are the defining characteristics of that pithy phrase.

The few times I’ve gone against my nature and have tried to compromise my principles (more or less, “go along to get along”), it hasn’t ended well. I have to live an authentic life as well as I’m able, as I’ve discussed many times at my blog already. Doing all of this seems to help me, especially with regards to my creativity. It also helps me to stay grounded.

So, when I see that Millennials and Gen Z are talking about the same things I am, but as if they’re new ideas, I get a bit frustrated.

Why? Well, it seems to me that every generation seems to want to reinvent the wheel. Because of this, knowledge that folks who’ve come before them — either people they meet, or books they read — seems to be lost in the translation.

Hell, what I’m talking about is not new. Marcus Aurelius was the first person known to ever write an autobiography of sorts, called Meditations. He discussed Stoic principles along with various things he saw in his life, and believed the best way to live was in authentic harmony with yourself, as that was the easiest way to coexist with nature and the natural world.

Of course, there are various beliefs about whether Marcus Aurelius wanted this book to be published. He was a Roman Emperor, and as such, everything he did and said and wrote was kept, scrutinized, and analyzed. He knew this, too. But he didn’t let that stop him, insofar as coming up with a way he believed helped him live a good life.

In other words, we’re lucky we have Aurelius’s Meditations, and for more than one reason.

Anyway, think about what the phrase “do what is right” means to you. Is it too simplistic of a philosophy to be useful? Is it perhaps too difficult of a philosophy to wish to aspire to?

Personally, I don’t think it’s difficult at all. Especially if you think about it as the predecessor of the Golden Rule, also known as “do unto others as you wish them to do unto you.”

Our world has many religious philosophies, and many different ways of seeing the world. One thing we all seem to agree upon, though, is that honest, ethical, above-board people are far easier to deal with than dishonest, unethical, unprincipled people.

My hope is that over time, we can find ways to find more common ground rather than less.

I also wish that, as people, we start looking for ways to communicate rather than ways to throw up roadblocks because someone’s a different race, ethnicity, sex, gender, etc.

If you need to see someone who could’ve been a right bastard (excuse my language), but instead chose to behave in as wise a manner as he could — that person being Marcus Aurelius, of course — to understand that life in all its variety should be appreciated rather than besmirched, take a second look at old Marcus’s writing.

After all, at one time, all roads led to Rome.

Just Reviewed “The Great Partnership” at SBR

leave a comment »

Folks, this morning I was pleased to be able to review a very different type of book by Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, THE GREAT PARTNERSHIP: Science, Religion, and the Search for Meaning over at Shiny Book Review (SBR for short, as always).  Sacks’ thought is clear, compelling, and extremely interesting . . . but some of what he says will almost certainly annoy you as well.

That’s the main reason I call this a very different type of book, because religious scholasticism very rarely is either this understandable or with as many points of contention.  Sacks explains things so well that most readers should get the gist of what he’s saying, but of course this particular book will work best for scholars of comparative religion and/or people who believe science and religion are far from incompatible.

Mind you, as I said in my review, Sacks is not the first to make many of these arguments.  The author of many of them as revised for 20th Century thought is Mircea Eliade, who died in 1986.  But Sacks is the first to do these ideas justice in a way that many people will find comprehensible, as Eliade’s thought processes are sometimes so opaque that other religious scholars and philosophers (as Eliade was both, just as Sacks himself is both) are still arguing over it all these years after Eliade’s death.

But Sacks is the first to make the argument that some of the odd dichotomies in the Christian New Testament are due to one thing: that the thought behind the New Testament was obviously Hebraic in origin (from the Hebrew language, in short), but the New Testament was actually written and popularized in Greek.  What that means in the shortest form possible is this: Anyone who reads the Christian Bible In English (or any other contemporary language) is reading a translation of a translation.

For that insight alone, you should read Sacks’ THE GREAT PARTNERSHIP.

But be warned: Sacks does not like many aspects of contemporary life, and he’s not shy about saying so.  Sacks is against same-sex marriage.  He’s against what he persists in calling “abortion on demand,” a highly inflammatory statement.  And he’s against assisted suicide, even if done by doctors on terminally ill people, calling it “euthanasia.”

Still, this is an important book that allows people who believe in science and religion to feel good about their beliefs.  And as such, I enjoyed it thoroughly.

Now, will you please go read my review?  Then, if the book intrigues you, go to the library and get it.  (Or better yet, buy a copy, as it’s now out in paperback.)

And do let me know what you think of it, once you’ve read it.  (Either one.)